This page records the architecture being developed through the website. It is intended to preserve the distinctions that will later underpin the book Reparation Bonds, written solely by John Canoe – Derrick Lynch.
Explain reparations financing, the Black Pledge relationship, bond ownership and reparations entitlement.
Eligible prospective participant selects a face value; £0 is paid; coded identifiers are generated.
Server stores the coded record, preserves status and records auditable events.
A printable latent certificate evidences the coded record without representing that money was invested.
No funding stage opens until legal, contractual, compliance, payment and register conditions are satisfied.
Where required, coded latent participation transitions into a controlled identity/compliance process separate from public verification.
Money is received only under the eventual live structure. The funded obligation is then recorded as such.
Principal and any agreed return are administered under final contractual terms and accounting controls.
Bondholder ID identifies a coded participant; Bond ID identifies an individual bond record.
Latent nominal value cannot be displayed or accounted for as money already received.
The financial claim of a funded bondholder is distinct from the underlying class of persons entitled to reparations.
Public verification confirms coded record facts without publishing private holder identity information.
Printing or reprinting a certificate does not multiply the registered bond record.
A status change requires a defined activation process; it must never occur merely because a certificate exists.